SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: INFOMAN who wrote (1063)5/8/1998 7:49:00 AM
From: DavidA  Read Replies (2) of 7235
 
The DME has publicly acknowledged that SUF had complied and met all appropriate proceedings, NGS have attempted to acquire the rights, while not acting through the laws within its own land. There is no specification of transfer or registration.

I think your walking on water if you anticipate that the constitution is to defend the actions of NGS, in not having previously registered the mineral rights prior to SUF conducting the fesability study.
It's also most apparent when attempting to sell the rights through form of an auction, your mandate is very clear get rich quick and lets hide behind the constitution for what we have not done correctly.

As Gull had previously stated "Don't under estimate De Beers" your contract is that which is based on the analyses of there fesability, what happens if it doesn't meet there requirements.

De Beers objective is not to ensure that NGS gets rich quick, lets be real we know what there mandate is and if it's not acquired, do they walk....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News