SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 485.49+1.8%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bearded One who wrote (6814)5/10/1998 2:02:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Read Replies (2) of 74651
 
I don't think that threatening to terminate a customer/vendor relationship is the same as a threat to put them out of business for competitive reasons. Clearly CPQ could have purchased Win95 from a different source and put the CD in the package. In case you didn't know, it has been my experience that when purchasing a new PC, I as the end user has to install Win95. Win95 was written onto the HD, but the install process had not been done. This was not some no name PC vendor, but Dell Computer. I'm not sure why they even wrote some code onto the HD, as the original CD was included with the package.

So I disagree with you that MSFT threatened to put CPQ out of business. For that matter, CPQ could have simply given a coupon for customers to order the software from any number of resellers. No big deal. Clearly there needs to be some kind of DOS boot disk, and the customers like for the HD to be pre-formatted. That stuff could have been done w/o Win95 I would bet. I'm sure there was a way around it. If Compaq bent to MSFT's demands to keep the IE icon on the desktop, they chose to do that willingly, and no harm would have accrued to them, IMO.

DK
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext