SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum
MU 399.63+0.5%Jan 23 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ratan lal who wrote (33195)5/11/1998 4:20:00 PM
From: Chas  Read Replies (1) of 53903
 
Ratan,
Heres the article:
techweb.com
If you believe the dataquest article he is saying glut thru 99 and shortage in 2000. That is what I am hearing mostly now, earlier many were predicting glut in 98 and tightening in 99Q1. There is just too much capacity for 64M and everyone is using MU formula now which is shrink the heck out of the parts. With the new deep uv steppers which have been shipping this is possible much easier than before. So everyone is shrinking their parts. There are going to be a ton of capacity out there for 64M pc100, a ton. The good news is the PCs are shipping with more memory now, so by end of 99 when Rambus and all the new flavors start shipping it will cause quite a few issues most likely. The interesting part is the cost to really get into the 256M production. You may have read the article today about Hyundai deciding to continue working on the Scotland fab, and will build that fab for 256M, because they plan to use 12" or 300mm equipment, that is the most feasible for that large a part to make any money. That will be a definite increase in FAB cost to build a 300mm fab over the present 8" fabs for 64M and 128M. Thats the deep pockets, I read mentioning what suppliers will have to have to continue to be in this business. Its interesting how this will play out over the next 12-18 months.
Good trading.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext