SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Oracle Corporation (ORCL)
ORCL 198.80-5.6%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (7098)5/11/1998 4:45:00 PM
From: Punko  Read Replies (1) of 19079
 
Innovation and execution are necessary but not sufficient conditions to compete effectively against a monopolist. Microsoft is in the position it's in because it is capable of stifling innovation, and it is actively doing it.

Poor products and clumsy competitors should shrivel up and die. But vibrant new technologies are being slowed, and in some cases not allowed to come to market, and that's where we have the problem. What incentive do you have if you think your ideas can be easily coopted? How can you execute when no funding's available, or when the rules of the game are controlled by your biggest competitor?

Check this out for an idea of how we can benefit from a reined in Microsoft.

www5.zdnet.com

The question of which is worse - the stifling monopoly or the meddling government - is not an easy one; an out of control DOJ is far more dangerous than Microsoft can ever be. But to wink at Microsoft and let it carry on is to pass on the unprecedented opportunities to accelerate the rate of innovation and broaden contribution to future progress that all these advances in computer and telecom technology have provided.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext