SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Turboe who wrote (16862)5/11/1998 7:27:00 PM
From: Terry Lyon  Read Replies (2) of 27968
 
I agree Turboe, but one thing that SI certainly doesn't necessarily achieve is the sense of unity. Cheryl and Brad were very sucessful in bringing unity to this thread initially, but now there are more people involved with all sorts of agendas. The only agendas that should count are those of the shareholders.

The main problem with SI is it allows unscrupulous manipulators to rattle shareholders and shake loose shares at a cheap price which they just buy and resell at a higher price later. Who got hurt? Of course the unwary rattled investor. Where I grew up that was called stealing and not investing! Legal, but still stealing and unethical by many standards.

With unity we could largely stop the manipulators of FAMH stock and I believe we would see a lot less fluctuation in the stock price and even feel more confident and in control of this investment. When manipulators step in and just take profits remember they have not contributed anything and they are stealing from shareholders and the company. This is precisely why BB stocks have such a bad reputation.

So the way we protect ourselves and our company is by joining forces and raising common issues and suggesting important shareholder policies. These actions should be focused specifically upon building shareholder value because by doing so the companies financial health increases and positively affects company longevity.

Also, it is important for a coelition of shareholders to work to resolve shareholder issues while not becoming a problem for the company. That is the company must focus on the business of the company whereas the coelition must focus on the the needs of the shareholder and not interfere with the business. The coelition has no intention to manage or micro manage any aspect of the companies business.

The shareholder coelition's major problem is shareholder inter-communication to establish primary issues, develop a priority list for those issues, and recommended actions to the company. By offering solutions as recommendations, shareholders do not become part of the problem.

The biggest problem is the Administration and inter-communication of shareholder concerns. We all know what the concerns are and we know that FAMH management knows what we are concerned about, so why the extra step. Unity - to show the company shareholders mean business and we're not going to be put off.

Frankly, I work 50 hrs a week and volunteer another 15 hrs so my time is largely gone. We should discuss this for a few days to a week and somehow make a decision. Please post your suggestions on this thread. Also how can restricted inter-communication be provided with some form of central management? I received some private messages that RMIL shareholders are already in such cooperation.

Thanks for reading my babble,
Terry
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News