SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Graham and Doddsville -- Value Investing In The New Era

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: porcupine --''''> who wrote (306)5/11/1998 10:10:00 PM
From: porcupine --''''>  Read Replies (1) of 1722
 
AT&T wants Baby Bells to separate call completion and local marketing.

AT&T Corp Chairman C. Michael Armstrong on Tuesday joined other long distance carriers in
calling for a restructuring of the 'Baby Bell' companies' local
networks, and a cut in fees they pay to local phone companies.

AT&T wants the Baby Bells separated into wholesale
businesses that complete calls for other carriers, and into
retail businesses that sell services to end users.

AT&T's proposal follows similar plans outlined by other
long distance companies including LCI International Inc
and MCI Communications Corp .

Under the 1996 Telecommunications Act, the Baby Bells must
open their local telephone market to competition before
entering the long distance market.

The Federal Communications Commission has rejected all four
Baby Bell long distance applications saying the companies had
not yet done enough to open local markets.

The call by AT&T and its long distance counterparts to
split the Baby Bells' wholesale and retail businesses are
beyond the measures outlined by the Telecom Act. But AT&T, MCI
and LCI said the extra steps may be needed to ensure fairness
as Baby Bells try to enter the long distance market.

AT&T also said the fees long distance companies pay the
local phone companies to complete long distance calls are at
least eight to 10 times more than their actual costs.

The long distance companies pay a fee to the Baby Bells in
order to have a long distance calls transmitted over a local
telephone network into a customer's home. AT&T contends these
fees are too high and serve as a subsidy for the Baby Bells.

"Separating the Bell companies' local networks from their
other operations will ensure that the Bell companies can't
subsidize their competitive activities from the inflated fees
they charge long distance companies to have calls completed,"
Armstrong said.

Splitting the Baby Bells would further fragment the
companies created by the break-up of Ma Bell in 1984, when AT&T
was split from the regional Bells.

((NEW YORK, May 5 (Reuters) - Jessica Hall, New York newsroom 212-859-1729))
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext