SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT -- Should the DOJ Break it up?
MSFT 517.03-0.2%9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mozek who wrote (71)5/11/1998 11:39:00 PM
From: JF Quinnelly   of 144
 
The way phone service worked was similar to cable TV today: companies had geographic monopolies. AT&T had the vast majority of service areas, but if you had lived in a GTE service area you would have purchased all of your service through them. And until the "Carterphone decision" of the '70s, you were forced to rent equipment from the phone companies instead of being able to buy your own.

The only non-AT&T providers I can remember were GTE and Rochester telephone, but there were probably a number of other small phone companies. And I think AT&T was the only long distance provider. For all intents and purposes AT&T had a monopoly even though it wasn't 100% of the U.S. market.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext