<< If 37% of patients had to quit from the side effects, a significant part of the target population will be eliminated from treatment. >>
Is the glass half full, or half empty? We could say that a significant percentage of the patients, 63%, did not have significant side effects. That's not bad. Plus, if they get good results from the 63% group, there is always the possibility of dosage adjustments, etc. as the product evolves, to deal with the 37% bad side effect problem.
I like the science. They piggyback onto the diphtheria toxin to attack the cancer cells. Who would of thunk that we would be using one disease to fight another. Hardly seems fair to the poor, helpless diseases. <g>
<==================================================================
"DAB389EGF is a recombinant toxin produced by expressing a fusion gene
consisting of the nucleotide sequences for the enzymatically active and membrane translocation domains of diphtheria toxin and sequences for human EGF."
===================================================================>
I like the deal. LGND is getting a load of science and a revenue producing product, for a pittance. I'd offer to pay for Seragen myself, out of my own pocket, if I had any money.
Might I quote Robinson, again, that he feels it will be a significant source of revenue starting in 1999.
I've got a question. When the FDA gives a product "fast track" designation, does that mean that the FDA has already taken a fairly good look at the product?
Good luck, Bob
|
