SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only!
AMD 217.53+1.5%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Xpiderman who wrote (6155)5/15/1998 1:52:00 AM
From: Kenith Lee  Read Replies (3) of 6843
 
XYZ,

CPQ uses a lot more Intel chips than AMD's. Unless CPQ switched majority of the chips from Intel to AMD, CPQ poor performance should be blamed on Intel. It would be painlessly to discontinue products based on AMD chips (since it relatively small compares to those based on Intel's) if profits weren't there. Would it?

Think about it if you still have your brain. CPQ uses second source to maximize profits. Generally, it costs more to deal with multiple vendors (CPU makers). I have been (many times) at CPQ manufacturing lines in Houston and Asia. New assemble lines have to be made and dedicated for certain types of chip and different vendors. Companies will not go to extra length unless they are favorable.

Not long ago when CPQ and other Tier 1 PC makers were in Intel only club, I heard nothing but praises. As so as anyone jump ship (even use a tiny fraction of their total units), you Intellopers pointed fingers and black-listed these companies. I wonder what if DELL starts using some K6, what will DragonBoy say? It sound like sourgrapes to me. This kind of stuff draws attentions to the DOJ.

If you still can't coup with this, you really deserve to be "XYZ" (last in IQ) than ABC. <ggg>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext