SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : AHTC Corp (AHTC)-formerly Advanced Health (ADVH)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LightPen who wrote (140)5/15/1998 11:00:00 AM
From: Tom D  Read Replies (2) of 371
 
Why H&Q downgraded...

(I posted this on the Yahoo thread. Thought it might be of interest to people here. Incidentally, that thread got contaminated by some people who tried to destroy it by posting dozens of disgusting vulgar posts. Although SI costs some money to join, it does have its benefits. Such activity wouldn't happen here.)

I tape recorded the conference call. Listened to Richard Lee's questions. I can't read his mind, but I think (from
his questions) he had two concerns. First, Richard Lee had projected earnings of $1.50 in 1999 and mgmt's
guidance during the conference call was $1.43. Second was probably the receivables. ADVH booked some
orders near the end of Q1 and didn't get a chance to collect them yet. By the conference call on 5/12 ADVH
had collected about half of that increment (i.e. they collected $2.7M of the roughly $5.4M increment in
receivables). As I have listened to the conference call a few times, it stikes me that mgmt was not well-prepared
to prove to skeptics how the IMM acquisition would be beneficial to future earnings. IMM lost a little under
$1M in 1997. Early in the call mgmt claimed there would be huge synergies. Richard Lee asked them to
quantitate how the synergies would occur. They couldn't. Of course they couldn;t. The acquistion was just
closed this week. But just because mgmt is unwilling to make hasty promises does not mean it was a poor
acquisition. I am a practicing internist who does global risk contracting. My life's work is in the business that
ADVH does. The IMM acquisition was inspired. It has awesome potential.

Even if they make $1.43 instead of $1.55 in 1999, so what? We are looking at a sustainable earnings growth
rate of over 30%. I would not hesitate to buy this stock under $20 per share, assuming that the investment time
horizon is 12 months or more.

This stock has been the object of a massive short-selling campaign. It is probably connected the the two New
York Observer articles, each coming out just after strong earnings reports. I am disappointed by Mr. Lee's
actions. H&Q is a class outfit. I would have expected Mr. Lee to have the courage to stick by a $12 stock that
has a 30% annual growth rate and current year EPS of $1 per share. Even if it was getting beaten up by short
sellers. I tried to buy his downgrade report from Ivestools but it was not available. Thanks to Louis Riley, I
think Mr. Lee will be proven wrong by the market, and that this will reflect poorly on his character.

Tom D12345
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext