Jason, I have been extremely busy for the past week or so and have not made time to keep up with this thread. But to come on and read your post to Kim was a very sobering experience indeed.
Since you don't seem to understand Mr. Brasingtons role, let me clarify. Kim has agreed to offer Naxos his significant experience with mining operations as well as his analytical and research skills to help us to fill in the gap between releases with the FACTS as he knows them to be. He also helps us all to understand what is between the lines on releases as they come out.
Kim has a very busy life already, with six kids and a full time job which requires long overnight shifts in a high pressure environment.
Your comment...
"But even recovery of my losses does not change my mind with regards to the way that you, your IR people, and your press releases have misled, misguided, and rained sunshine on your unanswered promises."
This is not Kim's company and therefor, your entire comment is so nonsensicle it is hard to know where to start. To my knowledge and experience, Mr. Brasington has offered the thread a consistant source of hard and cold facts and honest analysis.
On the whole, Mr. Brasington has not lost anything with the lack of your respect. But on a personal note, rudeness is another matter. You owe Mr. Brasington an apology, and since he is the kind of gentleman who would not insist on it, I think I will.
Mark and Henry have already expressed what I feel is the general opinion of Kim on this thread and you are the only person I can recall to be so far off the mark with your opinion of his contributions but more to the point here, your attack on his character.
Tom F. |
