Easy does it Ron...not time to get overexerted...even if you have now at last deduced that you were probably a big buyer of BC's stock...
Get back to the main issue - CAN the processor work and produce, as advertised, for extended periods of time, in a production environment? And is there anything that present shareholders/limited partners can do to further achieving this end?
And as far as "...getting tired of the conjecture and mental masturbat**n over what occurred to cause this situation..." - there's no reason to get 'tired' or to 'conjecture' - GRNO's already disclosed what happened - sham sales, false hype, stock price inflation, big players cash out, etc. What could be clearer? Just read the SEC filings and you won't have to conjecture - after all, that's what they are for, to DISCLOSE to the shareholders.
Just don't forget GRNO's caution from the June 30, 1997 10-QSB:
"...the Company expressly disavows all information and statements contained in prior filings, public announcements and other information disseminated by the Company (including, without limitation, press releases and electronically disseminated information) to the extent such information or any such statements conflict or are otherwise inconsistent with the material set forth herein or elsewhere in this Report. In the event of any such conflict or inconsistency, the information contained herein and elsewhere in this Report shall control, and no reliance should be placed on such conflicting or inconsistent prior information."
And, O yes - where did you say you saw those Form 144's for 400,000 shares? The ones that are "out there somewhere"!
Bill Fuller |
