Trooper Technologies Inc. (TPP.V) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Trooper Technologies Inc. (TPP.V)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Grant MacMillan who wrote (1210)	5/16/1998 2:37:00 PM
From: barry bushell	Read Replies (2) of 2090

Ah Grant, you touch on an interesting topic when you write, "A company worth investing in for the long haul should be able to operate more independently than this one seems able to." A few posts back, Tom Kinakin wrote, "Trooper will be a huge success with or without Thermo Tech." I asked Tom to elaborate, but he hasn't done so. But doesn't the phrase "with or without Thermo Tech" sound like more independent operation to you? So does Tom Kinakin know more than he says? With TPP, we have a stock with a share price that has been less than 2.00 (and is, therefore, a speculative stock) coming out of the VSE (some say nothing good ever comes out of the VSE) with no earnings, no patent, and a legal dispute that could go on indefinitely. And yet Tom Kinakin is building a large position which is going to make him wealthy in his retirement. Tom is very grateful that this opportunity has presented itself to him at this point in his life. And, coincidentally, the share price has been rising markedly. So what gives? Is Tom on to something? Barry Bushell

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next