SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 117.61+3.0%4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (11769)5/16/1998 5:44:00 PM
From: Lucretius  Read Replies (1) of 116815
 
All need to read this. It is not new news, and I knew salaries were being understated, but I had no idea of the enormity of the problem:

forbes.com

got to the site and type in: (options) in the search box and click on the 5/18 story.

Read the whole thing, be sure and click on continue to main story. Things are going to get much uglier than I thought.

This house of cards is going to come crumbling down. Here's a little excerpt:

"Shareholder interests aside, the vast spread of option programs may also be causing us to underestimate inflation. Fed watchers know that Alan Greenspan pays close heed to wage costs as he scours the horizon for signs of inflation. Are these costs understated? At Smithers &Co., Daniel Murray believes that incomes from employment in the U.S. have been rising around 2.5% faster than published figures state. Greenspan is certainly aware of the danger. Minutes from the Federal Reserve meeting of Dec. 16, 1997 say: "Employers were continuing their efforts to attract or retain workers . . . by means of a variety of bonus payments and other incentives that were not included in standard measures of labor compensation."

Sounds like stock options to us. "

-Lucretius


Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext