SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Magnetics Corp
APM 1.340-4.3%9:43 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frodo Baxter who wrote (11932)5/16/1998 9:26:00 PM
From: Tom Simpson  Read Replies (3) of 12298
 
>Another way to look at it is that the shorting pays for the bonds, so
>that they get their interest with NO principal.

Thanks Lawrence,
"Another way" is just the one I was wondering about. I'm thinking....
1. I buy 100k in notes which gives me 6% per year and dibs on any stock gains over 28.75.
2. If I get gains, at any time I can freeze them by shorting enough shares to give me 100k in cash which in turn makes me 5% at money market rates. I've now got 11% coming in on a 100k investment and I still have a little exposure to the equity upside on the residual shares I didn't short.

Something doesn't seem quite right....even for an institution. Seems like somewhere somehow there would be a rental charge for the borrowed shares coming out of this thing.

>Economically, converts are nothing more than junk bonds without the
>stigma.
What irritates the hell out of me in this case is that I didn't get a shot at buying the damn things. In a lot of ways they look more like a form of common stock with preferences....namely a 6% dividend and full participation on the upside.

Best Regards....Tom
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext