SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ben Lunsford's SCREAMING BUYS!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (244)11/14/1996 6:55:00 PM
From: Marco Polo   of 458
 
Innocent until proven guilty is fine, but why must we involve lawyers? France's system is much better. "The state" assembles all the evidence against a defendant they can, and the state rep and the defendant both go in front of a judge who questions them in front of each other and he decides the case. The truth is probably found much more often.

And..... after we prove someone guilty of murder, why are they allowed 15 appeals lasting 10 years before they are put to death? This is not justice.

In our society, the criminal always ends up better off than the victim. If this were hell that would be all good and well but this is the US of A man and it shouldn't happen. As for killing them "gently," why waste money and effort on gas or electricution? They still end up dying more peacefully than the victim. For violent murderors, I would volunteer myself to chop their damn head off.

Bring back the guilletine! It was inexpensive, efficient, and just!

~Ben
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News