SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim McMannis who wrote (32747)5/18/1998 1:34:00 PM
From: Brian Hutcheson  Read Replies (1) of 1580668
 
Jim , re. your thoughts on AMD's cheaper production costs
In this PC business environment with HP and others feeling the pressure on prices , AMD comes into its own . The success of IBM and Compaq with K6 sales is evident still e.g. a local newspaper last week had only K6 PCs advertised with the exception of a Cyrix PC .
Future Shop (a Canadian superstore) seems to adverise mainly IBM or Compaq K6 PCs on the front page of their flyer , while Intel is tucked inside somewhere .
The question is , can AMD make good profits in that environment ?
If AMD can produce 2000 wafers per week with half being K6-2 at just 50% yield they will produce approx 2.6M K6 classic and 2.1M K6-2
If we assign an ASP of $110 for K6 classic and $150 for K6-2 (conservatively) then we arrive at $601M revenue for CPUs , that coupled with their usual revenue of $400 approx for the rest of their business would give $1B for a quarter . Their break even revenue is I believe around $650M-$700M , from the extra $300-$350M they should have great earnings possibly a $1 a share per quarter or more .
Brian
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext