Another little historical fact. Enjoy Shalom
Rome's War Against the Jews: Anti-Semitism in the New Testament
( A COMMENTARY BY MONSIEUR J. DURAN ) 12-3-90
Now, we see that the purpose of these insertions into the 'New' ( and
improved ) Testament becoming apparent. I myself, have pointed out this
part of the strategy before and have known the detailed purpose of the
insertions of anti-semitic passages in the N.T. However, being
preoccupied with explaining other areas of the war, I have neglected to
at least put forth a dissertation which can later be built upon or
annotated.
Even though there are quite a few places to find examples of which to
expound upon, I will not endeavor to do such a massive work herein.
Instead, I will cite a few, and just talk a bit upon how they have indeed
been explained away ( to the public ) quite successfully until now, by
some religious persons ( I will not call these persons 'scholars' - they
are not ). Now, some of these persons have quite simply said, "There are
'not' any anti-semitic references in the N.T., its just that some people
'want' to take them that way." As I said a moment ago, I do not consider
the person making this statement a scholar by any means, for he puts
study on an opinionated level. In other words, even if it did contain
anti-semitic passages, it did not affect him, because he just simply
'would not take it that way.' This type of reasoning is called 'circular'
logic, and is not scholarly.
To those persons who 'believe' rather than study ( objectively ), "Truth
shall bring each piece of the puzzle to its place, so if you fall short
and do not study, but only believe - do not be surprised if truth exposes
your shortcomings." This is what Abelard Reuchlin said on the subject of
anti-semitism in the N.T., "As the years after 70 ( C.E. ) rolled by, the
Jews continued rejecting the ( Jesus ) story. Piso's successive versions
became increasingly anti-Jewish. But still he was prohibited by the
Flavian emperors from taking the tale to the non-Jews. Then in 96 he and
Pliny assassinated Emperor Domitian, second son and last survivor of
Vespasian. Nerva became Emperor, named the Pisos to his council, an
allowed them to do what they pleased." At that time the 'Jews' (
Pharisees ), were keeping records of their own, with meanings that would
not become apparent until all of the rest of the pieces were known. But,
then, as we will see, some other things that were written were, quite,
apparent. Duringhe time of the war, the Rabbis wrote the Benedictions.
In Benediction 12 ( written about the year 85, when Domitian was Emperor
), we find the statement, "For the renegades let there be no hope, and
may the arrogant Kingdom soon be rooted out in our days, and the
Nazarenes ( Note: Our ancestors who fought in the great war referred to
the followers of 'the Nazarene' i.e., 'Jesus', and therefore meaning the
Christians, as the Nazarenes. They used phrases like 'the Minim', 'the
Ha'min', or 'the 24 minim' in place of the name 'Piso'. They called Piso
'Hamen' to compare him to the Hamen in Esther ) and the minim perish as
in a moment and be blotted out from the book of life and with the
righteous may they not be inscribed. Blessed art thou, O Lord, who
humblest the arrogant." Who do the Rabbis 'bless' when they say 'O Lord'?
The Emperor Domitian! The Pisos retaliate by having the new character
Paul come into the story and declare that the law of the Jews is no
longer valid.
The Pisos ridicule the Rabbis by being so bold as to write them into the
actual 'Gospels' as they go along. I'd like to include in this
commentary, a little on the subject of the ridicule of the Rabbis in the
N.T., and I'd like to emphasize the importance of studying 'all' of the
possible sources of the time - including the N.T. books that were kept
out of the canon.
From careful study and comparison, I would thus far conclude that 'The
First Gospel of the Infancy of Jesus Christ' was written about the same
time as Acts and Luke, which was around the year 95 C.E. In the
apocryphal 'Infancy', we find that they have inserted Rabbi ben Dosa ( a
student of Zakai ), as 'the son of Hanani, a Jew'. The full name of this
Rabbi was 'Hanina' ben Dosa ( Ref. Chap. XIX, 18 and 20 ). They insert
Rabbi Gamaliel, the Jewish leader who was the President of the Pharisaic
Party and descendant of Hillel. They changed his name around and put him
in Acts 22:3, 5:38-39. They have Rabbi Akiba in Acts 11:28, 21:10. And
they have the Jewish commander, Eliezer ben Yair, who died fighting the
Pisos in 73 C.E., as 'Jairus' ( Roman form of 'Yair' ), in Mark 5:22.
Abelard Reuchlin, in his 'The True Authorship of the New Testament',
says, "More vengeance was wrought by Piso by his picturing the Jews, in
successive gospels, as increasingly evil." In Matthew, chapter 23 ( the
newer version written about the year 75 C.E. ), Piso has his character
'Jesus' to repeatedly call the Scribes and Pharisees hypocrites & vipers.
In Matthew 3:7, the Pisos take another swipe at the Jews. This time, they
have it done in the character of John the Baptist. In Luke 3:7, again it
is John the Baptist who raises anti-semitism, only this time, on a
broader, more inclusive level. Then in Acts 23:12, they have it that 'the
Jews' have formed a conspiracy to kill Paul. When the Gospel of John was
written ( by Fabius Justus Calpernius Piso aka 'Justin Martyr' ), in the
year 105, Justus has the character 'Jesus' to tell the Jews ( in his
story ), "You are of your father the devil." What Abelard Reuchlin says
on the subject is, "The N.T. pictures the Jews as the enemies of Jesus,
of Paul, anof the message of the Gospel." With these statements placed in
the gospels, they could then be used as a catalyst within the new
churches to rally the gentile masses to war against the Jews! I have by
no means here touched upon all of the anti-semitic passages in the N.T.,
nor would I want to here in this short commentary, the purpose is to show
the war of the time in its proper context. And, most importantly, to
advise you that the war is not yet over!!! Now, while the Romans were
instigating & proliferating anti-semitism in the churches, the Rabbis
were writing & the scribes were copying and hiding the writings so that
one day the truth would be known.
Rabbi Akiba wrote; "Tithes are a fence around riches, vows are a fence
around abstinence; a fence around wisdom is Silence." Of course we know
what he is referring to when he says 'tithes', he is alluding to that
device of the Christian Church. The money raised went into the 'war' fund
( The Roman Rulers were already rich beyond belief by virtue of
inheritance, taxes, tributes, and now by receiving 10% of all the
converts' income ). When Rabbi Akiba and Simon bar Kokhba lead the revolt
of 132-135 C.E., they had a commemorative coin struck in honorable
remembrance of Eleazar ben Yair, who had died fighting the Romans at
Masada in 73 C.E., it also served to help stir people to help in the
cause.
Now, when you go to look at and study the New Testament, and you come
across those things that had at one time seemed vague or obscure - you
may realize that it was all written for a purpose, but maybe now you'll
wonder for 'what' purpose. It just seems that people keep blocking out
the fact that the New Testament was written at a time when there was a
war going on. We, the inner-circle of Jews, have lived a great many years
with this heavy burden upon us. This recalls what that one Jewish
medieval writer, Rabbi Duran had said, "And it would appear that it was
God's ( meaning: 'Caesar' ) intention to destroy all those equivocating (
meaning: using ambiguous or unclear expressions to either avoid
commitment, or to deliberately mislead ) anussism ( 'anussim', being of
'the ring' or 'the circle'. Taking the two words together, 'equivocating
the circle', meaning: 'alluding to the inner-circle'), who acted as if
they had invented a new law unto themselves, but whose end proves that
they did not die the death martyrs, for when asked in which religion they
wished to die, they chose Christianity in order to die the easier death.
They died with the cross in their hands, and only a small number of them,
most of whom were women, died as 'Jews'."
How is it that something this fantastic ( by the mind of the outer-circle
), could have possibly happened and still have been hid for all of these
years? In the days of the great war, nobody wrote anything without
Caesar's permission by penalty of death. The Rabbis risked death to leave
us some measure to go by. Down through 'history', the Caesars continued
to rule, changing their names every so often. They made the public
'think' that Rome fell. By the way, another way that you can check to
find that these statements are true is to look and find that 'all' of the
Caesars were in fact related to each other, that's right, they hid the
fact that they were just one great big family ruling. They did this for
the same reason that they always had, so that the masses would not know
to what degree they were really subject. There has always been a need to
let the subjects think that they are free to some extent. So, the family
and their relatives lived on down through history. They ruled with
Constantine at e mast-head, they ruled by the name 'Merovingian', a
branch of the family wrote a new book based upon the 'Jesus' story, and
they ruled through the prophet Muhammad. This branch carried some of
their rule into Spain.
The Merovingian rule survived in the person of Charlemagne. And, the
descendants of Charlemagne went on to rule in France and England. And a
branch went on to rule in Russia as the 'Czars' (meaning 'Caesar'.) The
family had a tight reign on all that was written up until about the
seventeenth century. There were several co-lateral branches of the family
ruling various places for centuries. In Germany, they were called
'Kaisers' ('Caesars'.) Much of the family went to rally around Hitler, to
impose an all encompassing censorship reinstatement.
This was the Third Reich of the Holy Roman Empire, who wanted to destroy
all of the Jews of the world, so that the rule of the family would never
be exposed.
I have compiled a list corresponding to both the books of the New
Testament apocrypha and the canon, which I will reproduce for you here in
the following manner;
CANON BOOKS WITH AUTHORS AND DATES
1. 'Logia Ur Marcus' -Lucius Piso (with Seneca's advice, c. 62 C.E.)
2. 'Logia Ur Matthias' -Lucius Calpernius Piso ( c. 70 C.E. )
3. 'Mark' -Arrius Calpernius Piso/Josephus ( c. 73 C.E. )
4. 'Matthew' -Arrius Piso/Josephus ( c. 75 C.E. )
5. 'Luke' -Arrius Piso/Josephus & Pliny ( c. 85-90 C.E. )
6. 'Acts' -Arrius Piso, Justus Piso, Pliny ( c. 96 C.E. )
7. 'Romans' -Proculus Piso, Claudia Phoebe ( c. 100 C.E. )
8. '1st Corinthians' -Pliny the Younger ( c. 100-103 C.E. )
9. 'Galatians' -Pliny the Younger ( c. 100-103 C.E. )
10. 'Ephesians' -Pliny the younger ( c. 100-103 C.E. )
11. '2nd Corinthians' -Justus (Martyr) Piso ( c. 100-103 C.E. )
12. 'Titus' -Pliny the Younger ( c. 100-103 C.E. )
13. 'Philippians' -Justus (Martyr) Piso ( c. 100-103 C.E. )
14. 'John' -Justus (Martyr) Piso ( c. 105 C.E. )
15. '1st Timothy' -Pliny the Younger ( c. 105 C.E. )
16. 'Colossians' -Justus Piso, Julianus Piso ( c. 106-107 C.E. )
17. '2nd Timothy' -Justus (Martyr) Calpernius Piso ( c. 107 C.E. )
18. '1st Thessalonians' -Justus, Julianus, Silvanus Piso ( c. 108 C.E. )
19. 'Philemon' -Justus (Martyr) Piso, Julianus ( c. 108 C.E. )
20. '2nd Thessalonians' -Justus (Martyr) Piso, Julianus ( c. 109 C.E. )
21. 'James' -Justin Martyr Piso ( c. 110 C.E. )
22. '1st Peter' -Proculus C. Piso ( c. 110-115 C.E. )
23. '2nd Peter' -Proculus C. Piso ( c. 115 C.E. )
24. '1st John' -Julius C. (Servianus) Piso ( c. 110-115 C.E. )
25. '2nd John' -Julius Calpernius Piso ( c. 113 C.E. )
26. '3rd John' -Julius Calpernius Piso ( c. 115 C.E. )
27. 'Jude' -Julius Calpernius Piso ( c. 115 C.E. )
28. 'Revelations' -Julius (Severus) C. Piso ( c. 137 C.E. )
29. 'Hebrews' -Flavius Arrianus ( c. 140 C.E. )
APOCRYPHAL BOOKS WITH AUTHORS AND DATES
1. 'Thomas' Gospel of the Infancy of Jesus Christ' -Arrius Piso ( c. 95
C.E. )
2. 'The Gospel of the birth of Mary' -Arrius Piso/Josephus ( c. 95 C.E. )
3. 'The First Gospel of the Infancy of Jesus' -Arrius Piso ( c. 96 C.E. )
4. 'The Protevangelon' -Arrius Piso/Josephus ( c. 98 C.E. )
5. 'Laodiceans' -Pliny the Younger ( c. 100 C.E. )
6. 'Paul and Seneca' -Pliny the Younger ( c. 103 C.E. )
7. 'Polycarp' (Igatius) -Pliny the Younger ( c. 103 C.E. )
8. 'Magnesians' -Pliny the Younger ( c. 100-110 C.E. )
9. 'Trallians' -Pliny the Younger ( c. 100-110 C.E. )
10. 'Romans' (Ignatius) -Pliny the Younger ( c. 100-110 C.E. )
11. 'Philadelphians' -Pliny the Younger ( c. 100-110 C.E. )
12. 'Smyrnaeans' -Pliny the Younger ( c. 100-110 C.E. )
13. 'Letters of Herod and Pilate' -Pliny the Younger ( c. 103-110 C.E. )
14. 'Ephesians' (Ignatius) -Pliny the Younger ( c. 110 C.E. )
15. 'Philippians' -Proculus C. Piso ( c. 110 C.E. )
16. 'Clement 1 & 2' -Julius C. Piso ( c. 115 C.E. )
17. 'The Lost Gospel According to Peter' -Proculus Piso ( c. 115 C.E. )
18. 'Barnabas' -Flavius Arrianus/Appian ( c. 143 C.E. )
19. 'Hermas' -Flavius Arrianus/Appian ( c. 145 C.E. )
20. 'Paul and Thecla' -Origen/Macrinus/Dio Cassius ( c. 210 C.E. )
|
