Dear Doc:
Appreciate you insights.
Was thinking the same thoughts myself. Unfortunateley there are too many illegitimate or not very pertinent companies on these bb's so that just about every bb is called into question.
When and if the one or two of the good ones rise to the surface, become apparent, these companies are guilty through association.
The stock detective...unfortunately in this case acted irresponsibly like too many "reporters" today. In the rush to be the first to report, "the stock defective" made many assumptions that will ultimately undermine the very actions that the "S.D" says it's seeking to achieve.
I'm confident in Glenn's ability. Again for all those impatient investors, Glenn has JUST started his marketing efforts. The ProNetLink story is so compelling...that I don't think a few hyperactive mm days will adversely effect the stock's value for very much longer.
In particular, when the number of subscribers continues to grow and this growth is factored in with the earnings from banner sales and commissions. The projection of positive EARNINGS will more than offset all the scurrilous reports printed hitherto. When the company reports earnings....who can say how high the valuations on PNLK will be. Again I refer, people to news.com for relevant and pertinent stories regarding the viability and valuations of other Internet Portal companies providing services that are no where near as extensive as ProNetLink's
So, in other words, don't worry, be patient, and you'll ultimately be very happy.
Sincerely,
ztect
btw- Just look at who's advertising on PNLK's site.
Fidelity, Netscape, Microsoft, Geocities, smallbizbooks, pcquote, to name but a few. Now why on earth would companies such as these waste their money advertising on PNLK's site if it was not for real? |
