I need your honest opinion, Harvey, as well as of any others who would care to reply:
Let's suppose someone was subpoened and went to testify at a SEC Hearing concerning GIFS, and spent 8 full hours going over what he knew.
But, at the conclusion of this hearing, one of the attorney's involved offered the warning, "...anything you write from now on [on the Internet] will/could/would be used to discredit you...what you know is very important." This statement was made to the "witness" after the hearing and conveniently "off the record."
Harvey, I'm wondering what the attorney meant. Who do you think he was trying to warn the witness against...the SEC? Was he trying to intimidate the witness or protect him?
And, to add further confusion to the warning, let's say the attorney sent a directive out to "ignore" the witness' request for clarification or an interpretation of what he was saying to the witness?
What do you think this all means?
Ken Todd |
