Let's see, if an underwriting is done correctly
Does Osicom always do things correctly? Remember that the proxy statements were sent out so late, that the shareholder meeting had to be rescheduled?
I don't think FULL NMS is too hard to get for this company
For the new company? We don't even know why it's been refused to Osicom, as it's apparently a Top-Secret, Eyes-Only, "If I told you, I'd have to kill you," kind of deal. [But I'm glad that you and others keep thinking of NMS; it's a point which shows that Par has absolutely no credibility. My assumption, in the absence of any willingness to tell us the truth, is that the NASD doesn't like Par, and won't give NMS listing to any company that he is associated with. Of course, this is only an assumption, and I'll be happy to be proven wrong.]
assets of parent fibr BALLOON WITH CASH AND VALUE OF THEIR HOLDINGS IN EN GROUP
Under control of Par Chadha...
* * *
Anyway, I sometimes feel silly playing the Devil's advocate, as there are plenty of short-sellers who do that. I am on your side, and hope we will all be rich some day, but I am reluctant to contribute to the hype. My reluctance to ever hype a stock (focusing only on the positives) is that if I encourage innocent new investors to buy into a company, and it doesn't succeed, I would feel guilty for misleading others. |
