Facts of history will speak for itself. There will be company history and there will be investor history. Choose your role and support whichever role you feel best.
But don't tell me I'm supporting something illegal. I'm not. No, you're not a bad guy. I'm not saying that. But I will say that I'm fed up with your misdirected anticisms. At least get consistent.
You want NETZ to be king where it's only a prince; you want NETZ to be queen where it's only a princess. Get rid of the royalty bit, will ya? Let it mature as it will. Maybe it's a good working class stock. Who knows!
At least know that your editorial slander won't help it or us, at all.
Personally, I think you've been subjugated with too much authority. You need things to happen a certain way, or you complain. My advice? Sit back and relax. If you think the idea might work, go with it. Don't attempt to destroy it in the process, because I'm going to object every time you do. So save yourself--and myself--a lot of extra work, will ya?
Ask a prudent question or propose a possible scenario that realistically fits (positive or negative). Tell us what other companies are doing, since you have an affinity for the sector. Here's one for ya, go have a drink and talk about NETZ in the bar, or the church! Which will it be? The tavern vote or the church vote?
Whatever you do, don't make my mistake: Don't mix margin with a penny stock! But stop making your own mistake: You're not saving anyone, except your own buy-in/sell-out timetables. And they conflict with my own. Why not stake out a small position and ride the wave? If it seems to be working, buy some more. If, in the end, it is fatal--get out.
We're not at either point yet, are we? So what's all your fuss about? |
