SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (4405)5/18/1998 10:40:00 PM
From: go4it  Read Replies (2) of 11603
 
Richard, You can completely discount the assays if you want but if you could have seen the disposition of the mineralization in the overheads that were presented I think you would not be so quick to discount what had happened. I believe that they hit a hot spot of Iridium that messed things up with the FA. Although the numbers presented were not valid for FA they were valid numbers for recovery. Those are the numbers that I am looking for.

It is my opinion that with the current market sentiment that Mxam, GPGI or anyone else for that matter could provide a 100 opt of gold in a COC and the market would still yawn.

The chemistry may be different but I bet that GPGI ore would work very well running through the Hewlette process and I believe that the reason that the GPGI ore is so much higher in quantity than the rest of the dirts is because of the screening that has already been done on the ore pile. Yes, Maybe they should talk.

It is my understanding that the COC was performed on a combination of 5 selected areas that were mixed together. I don't know if these were virgin areas or not but if they were then perhaps they experienced the Iridium for the first time.

I do believe that we all have plenty of time to accumulate shares if that is our wish. I don't think Mxam is going to go to the moon in the very near future but it may over time. I have not yet told you about the forward looking statements that were made.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News