Buckeye. Thanks for your support and vote of confidence. While I would be honored and flattered to play some role, I know from watching the posts on this board that there are many, articulate, knowledgable individuals who are better qualified to lead the FAMH charge back.
My post appears to have had a positive impact on the members of this thread. I really appreciate the postive feed back, and an A+ from PsycProf is the icing on the cake, but we have a long way to go.
First things first, we need to get this board's health restored. As far as the naysayers are concerned, LE is the best at his trade. He is entitled to his position and I would encourage him to continue with his thought provoking insights. I know he has irritated Ira Monas in times past with some unfortunate responses; however, we need to move on. LE, I personally hope to see more of your thoughtful posts.
BOTTOM LINE:
1. FAMH value is in the tank, and there needs to be a concerted effort by all stakeholders to get it back (stakeholder is defined as stockholders, employees, customers, vendors, communities in which FAMH has operations).
2. The concerted effort has to be led by the CEO (Maximizing FAMH value is the CEO's primary, full time responsibility).
3. I am personally ready to do whatever is necessary to help (yes, I want to see a $20 stock price within three years)!!!!
Dick |
