SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jack Clarke who wrote (21772)5/19/1998 2:33:00 PM
From: Skipper  Read Replies (3) of 108807
 
Jack,

It would be necessary for the rich to understand that it is in their best interests to help the poor. If they did not, they would pay the consequences. Capitalism is still the only "natural" economic system. I don't believe that our country is in better condition for all the attempted intervention and meddling. Capitalism is based on the individual, which is a real entity. "Society" is a word, an apparition. Individuals have substance. You are a doctor, I am a patient. You provide a real service to me, and I give you value in return. The morality inherent in this system is that which acknowledges each individual's right to exist. If you are not paid for your service, as in the case of communism or socialism, you are denied your due, and that is immoral. What is moral is that which promotes life, and your life is not promoted when you are robbed. If you choose to help an individual where the return to you is the satisfaction of promoting the life of another who is in need, then that is also moral. If a third party takes from you to give to someone else, that is immoral. The difference is whether you retain your sovereignty over your own life. It is wrong for someone to take that away from you.

Skipper
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext