SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Confluence who wrote (1161)	5/20/1998 12:52:00 AM
From: DavidA	Read Replies (1) of 7235

Confluence, As you have noted, that is preciously the issue which is to be addressed. If an heir to the mineral rights has not obtained cession thereof and a period of not less than two years has expired from the date on which he became so entitled, section 17 can be invoked. However, most unusual is that we are lead to believe that (29) heirs consistently have no record or knowledge of these predecessors, which dates back less then thirty years, upon which time they had died. In being informed that this group consists of prominent business people, doctors lawyers is Infoman to confirm that these beneficiaries had never disclosed the estate in review of contents and distribution. I find it odd that an Heir has presented a thorough DD of there findings "News Flash" and then have the tenacity to directly state that they had no formal knowledge of there descendents in question, to imply that the existence of any mineral rights were unknown, comfortably speaking. P.S. This reminds of the movie "Sting" however in this event NGS are still to be stung, with the implementation of section 17...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next