>>> Normally I would not respond, but lets set the record straight. <<<
Au contraire, you seem to be glued to your keyboard...
>>>I could are less what your expeience is. You told me that you knew what you were talking about and that I didn't.<<<
Both statements you make in this paragraph are true, more or less. Congratulations.
>>>Yet despite all of this, you have never heard me say that I was an "expert"<<<
Over and over you referred to your expertise while referring to others as 'morons', 'idiots', and worse.
>>>The only people on this forum who even bother to aim jokes are the MSFT basher, who coincidentally tend to be the most irrational.<<<
So all your critics are crazy, eh? OK.
>>>Judging from this statement, you can't tell much. Why don't you go back and actually read the posts you are fantasizing about.<<<
As far as I can tell you haven't answered the question yet. Sadly, the thrilling phrase 'socio-economic majority' remains undocumented as to it's origins. Too bad, because I suspect it might be copyrightable by 'The Mind of Reg(tm), Inc', whence it came.
Now since this gobbldegook turns out to be a Reg invention, I wonder about 'captive reinsurer concept funded with medical inflation rate option embedded bonds' and 'before it became vogue.' If it's in vogue I bet there is an internet link (no, not yours), you could point me to that describes this exciting field of finance (I presume) in a little detail. Perhaps they will mention your contribution to the theory of the field and we all will be duly impressed, in not with the writing ability of those in the financial analysis business, then with the fact that something you said turned out to be other than hot air.
Cheers,
Chaz |
