SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: BillyZoom who wrote (32338)5/22/1998 3:17:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker  Read Replies (1) of 35569
 
Apparent Insolvency, Part III

OK, lets try this from one other perspective. Assume ALL of their current liabilities don't have to be paid right away. Let's just look at cash.

They've got $500,000 in cash, which happens to be collateral on a loan of the same amount. So, can't spend that.

They've got 1 million shares of MGAU, current value of 46 cents, or $460,000.

They say MGAU owes them $240,000, but MGAU says IPM owes them $50,000. So, I wouldn't count on the $240,000 "owed" by MGAU.

I was wondering why the heck would they borrow $500,000 when the collateral for the loan is the loan proceeds. The answer, obviously, is for short-term liquidity so they don't have to sell all their MGAU shares all at once. But since the collateral for the loan is a cash deposit of $500,000, it seems clear they must maintain a cash balance of $500,000. Therefore, in order to pay the bills, they are going to have to a) sell more shares (and their most recent sales have been of the floorless convertible nature) and/or b) sell their MGAU shares.

Sure wouldn't want to be holding MGAU right now.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext