SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mohan Marette who wrote (852)5/23/1998 4:23:00 AM
From: LoLoLoLita  Read Replies (1) of 12475
 
Mohan,

If they can make a 200-kiloton device, there is no reason they couldn't make a megaton device. Once they have the concept, the only constraint is size and weight capacity for their delivery mechanism. That, and the inability to test underground at large yields.

Everything else being equal, a 200-kiloton device would be smaller than a 1 megatonner.

Have you seen anything where India is claiming to be able to deliver this large weapon by missile? Or is it supposed to be a bomb?

I'd be very sceptical of their ability to put It (the big one) in a missile warhead. Certainly impossible without beaucoup more nuclear tests.

The thing I find suspicious is India saying that they are willing to sign the CTBT (now!) and do no more tests. If they signed now, then they would be unable to weaponize their H bomb. If, with our 1000+ nuclear tests and very sophisticated computer models, the U.S. can't develop new nuclear weapons without doing actual tests, I'm hard pressed to see how India can do it.

David
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext