Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC )

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LTBH who wrote (781)	5/23/1998 1:30:00 PM
From: Zeuspaul	Read Replies (1) of 14778

The 300MHz was selected over the 330 for several reasons. First the 08/98 roadmap prices are $209 vs $316 respectively. Secondly, due to technical internal design changes of the 330MHz, real applications may run at the same or very slightly slower speeds. At the very best they will run marginally better. Why pay 50% more. Is heat a consideration here? Isn't the 333 more efficient and wouldn't this be a benefit of the 333 over the 300? Is the design change in the 333 unique to the 333 or does it extend to the 350 and 400 CPU's? Zeuspaul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next