Who knows for sure, except management. Could be because of (i) stupidity and lack of planning (unlikely), (ii) a desire to get rid of vestige of past, with confusing reference to Netmaster Group, even if ZULU is used for short time (a possibility), or (iii) part of plan in which ZULU becomes dominant operating entity/identity for the new combination (a stronger possibility).
To me, would be foolish to do anything more to promote Zulu name, tradename, identity, goodwill (LOL), etc., UNLESS THERE WAS AN INTENT TO EXPLOIT THAT NAME FOR FUTURE COMBINATION.
I think everyone who has commented on this point on this thread has said same thing. I find it particularly reassuring to see continuted promotion/explotiation of ZULU name. In my opinion, this also works against any desire to minimize/downplay/undervalue ZULU business if and when stock transfer is figured out. |
