International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: C L who wrote (502)	11/17/1996 8:49:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	of 35569

CL, I have looked past the end of my nose. You call that report impressive? I sensed frustration in the last company announcement. Much like what has come from GPGI's Jensen. My last communication with IPM had a response that they were looking for Naxos to pave the "fire assay" way. We all know where that stands now. We also know the result of just attempting to remove the metal. I was a scientist/engineer for most of my life and can understand the difficulty of extracting the metals from the matrix at affordable cost. I hope you make a lot of money on IPMCF, but I will not lose anymore on it. There are some deals that I don't have to have. I also know that my thinking is somewhat past my nose now.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next