Hi Milk! Glad I was up to see "every line" of your post!
I found that one reading was not enough.
People, go back and read #5025
a couple more times. You will notice more.
A note for all CVIA Shareholders:
Several of you may not know that Charlie, who commented in the
post just above, took advantage of SI's one month free trial.
We apparently liked the direction he was comming from. The proof
being that several people from this thread contributed for his
lifetime membership. A handful of "investors" wouldn't do that.
But a handful of "people" would.
Charlie has been, until just lately, bewildered that people
might actually do such a thing because he posted here a few
times. He is a real person, not a "scam", and we should see him
posting here within a week for life.
Both ways, it's rather amazing and wonderful what a thread
can do. A bunch of people jotting notes to each other. There
is power in that, if power is desired.
Jack Arnold is a person too. If he possesses any "shifty"
quality, perhaps this is what allowed him to get as far
he has. Or because he is operating under the influence
of the new leader, Mr. Charles. That can cause resentment, and of
course a legal "touch" could restore some CVIA strength, but
the extras are bringing it into murky area.
My thought is, if it doesn't work out, they will undo it by
themselves. Also, it is very difficult for shareholders
to respond from the outside and maximize the share value
beyond this point. Quite unaware of the
particulars, I imagine the margin of shareholder luck
in this present activity is growing thin.
Waiting, as Milk says, to find what waiting will bring
could be very rewarding once the new company starts
making moves. If you are short term, perhaps it is
the best way to minimize loss as well?
To new readers:
Milk is very consistent and politely short with words.
In more than my opinion. When Milk offers any,
please remember to weigh them appropriately!
Dave |
