SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Georgia Bard's Corner

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: R. Bond who wrote (2591)5/25/1998 9:31:00 AM
From: Sojourner Smith  Read Replies (1) of 9440
 
The background of the MINE officials and staff seems very
solid. I will try reaching some of them and do some checking to confirm claims.

These threads are often destructive to stocks and investors.
People post negatives over a long weekend after the market has closed when nothing can be answered with facts. If you don't like a stock, stay with your own. If you have solid information, fine then post. If it doesn't meet your criteria, then post. However, to call
the company a scam without facts is disgusting. To compare it
to BreX without facts is unfair, when any BB could be a hidden
BreX. Also, no one has been able give any facts behind the SEC suit. Is it really serious or not?

I think two things may be going on. First there is a posting war. One
group blasts MIDL, the other MINE. Nothing was ever posted
negative about MINE, until TMex bought it. Second, I think
some are trying to get shares.

I am not telling anyone to buy MINE or sell MIDL.
I actually like both. MINE is at a good price historically
and once more information comes in, it will do very well IMO.
My only problem with MINE is the naysayers that
create fear to shake out weak hands.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext