Mel, you may support your company all you wish, ignore and downplay the past, and try to discredit individuals. It is done too often on many threads. What is important is not the posters as some have you believing, but instead, the documented statements and actions of a company.
It is best to thoroughly look into all warning signals unemotionally and reassess a company on a regular basis. Often, the biggest stooges are the ones that blindly accept what ever a penny stock company tells them. In the end, a company's performance will establish a stock value.
If a company's largest operation is discontinued because it was evicted from the plant it leased for nonpayment, and never was put back into operation, which way based on that knowledge would you guess the stock price to go?
If a company shuts down another operation, (the second of three) while releasing that all three operations are running at capacity and are profitable, (see above) which way do you think the stock price shall go?
If the company is in default in its payment for its last operation and derives very little if anything from it, which way will this contribute to the stock price?
The above questions do not refer to FAMH obviously, but as one considers their investment, do you support investors getting blindsided all at once, or do you think it is better to know this information beforehand and have an option to reconsider your investment before a trading halt, which eliminates any opportunity for you to change your mind during that period and often one see dramatic erossion in value if it opens.
It all depends upon if you are buying a piece of a company or you are buying for reasons not tied to the operations what so ever of a company. History is helpful in many cases in assisting and guiding.
|
