Arconenergy, Inc. (Long Term Investors and Fundamentals) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Arconenergy, Inc. (Long Term Investors and Fundamentals)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Charger who wrote (1729)	5/25/1998 12:38:00 PM
From: George Burdell	Read Replies (1) of 1757

Charger - At the time this discussion started, GB was telling folks with this type of question (that he considered beat to death) to post on the original thread. I did. After extended number crunching on my part, I have decided that after taxes are considered, the P and the W are dead even. However, the cost of the W is up and the cost of the P is down since I first asked about this situation, around 3 PM Friday... I'm sure that it will require fresh number crunching any time an investment is made from this point forward. If money is limited, and you can pay the .50 conversion cost out of future funds, rather than by selling off a percentage of your holdings, W are better. If you want to buy now and not check your portfolio until 2001, the P are better. Other situations, you can't go wrong. I'm considering buying the P for the dividend and then holding until it appreciates back to my purchase price and selling. No tax liability until ultimate sale and no out of pocket expense (except opportunity cost), pretty sweet. GB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next