Yahoo thread post on LU/ASND strategic fit
messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com
Message 15468 of 15478 Reply
Long_on_Tech, ASND/LU musings mcammarata (28/M/Toms River, NJ) May 25 1998 5:13PM EDT
L_o_T, To answer your 3 questions "What is your take on the Yurie-Ascend overlap? Does it still make sense for Lucent to aquire ASND? Did it make sense for Lucent to aquire Yurie if they were planning later to aquire ASND?""""" I think the answers are 1)Not a problem, 2) Yes, 3) Yes. There is moderate overlap between Ascend SA family and Yurie, but you have to look at this in a more revealing light. October is 4 months away at this point. The Lucent execs know that they would like to acquire ASND, along with Qualcomm or Nokia. The issues here revolve around what might happen and what might be possible. From the Lucent guys perspective, there is no guarantee that ASND will be available come 10/98. There is a distinct fear that someone like NT or ERICY may use time to their advantage and take out ASND at any moment for a market moving premium like 60 or northwards. NT or ERICY can't wait for October to come, that would invite LU to step into the fray much as Worldcom did with MCI. Therefore, LU can't ride it's entire strategy on ASND being available for sale in October. That pushes it to make realistic, doable deals that are achievable today with the available players. This has lead to the purchase of Prominet, Livingston, and Yurie. If ASND is gone or unavailable when October comes then LU will work with what it was able to put together. If overlap exists, it will be a small price to pay for strategically positioning yourself for whatever the future brings. Consider Yurie and Livingston as insurance policies. Alternatively, what if October comes along and various factors make an ASND acquisition untenable to LU shareholders, like a frothy price in the 70-80 range which would make the buyout around 90-100. This would be a tough decision for the shareholders of LU to sign off on. Also, maybe September talks between Mory and LU break down over strategic disagreements or the like. For LU, there is no guarantee, therefore it was forced to do what could be done thus far. For ASND, there is nothing but upside, resulting from having the right products at the right stages in the right markets. People just don't care that much about upgrading their LAN's today, that's not the bottleneck. Upgrading the WAN's are the big story and there is no amount of bandwidth yet available that can satisfy every Net hungry consumer out there. Therefore, BAY, COMS, and CS share prices just fritter away while ASND, CSCO, TLAB and the like shoot skyward on real order growth to buildout the telcomm and data networks of the future. I believe this answers your questions Later Mike Cammarata
ASND: Quote | Profile | Research This Is a Reply to: Msg 15465 by Long_on_tech View Replies to this Message
<- Previous Next -> Message 15468 of 15478 Reply
Terms and Conditions Yahoo! is a trademark of Yahoo! Inc. Copyright c 1994-98 Yahoo! All Rights Reserved. |