Can you please elaborate, your post is somewhat
cryptic, or maybe it is sarcastic? I thought you
were quite optimistic for mine, that post makes it
sound like the sampling is all a farce (?).
My understanding is that there were many
many samples taken over a wide area at sufficiently
representative depths that 6.4M proven means there
is a good chance there really is at least 6.4M
proven.
If it is all bullshit, then these people have an
awful lot of nerve--plus, having read over the
bios on the parties involved, looks like these
folks do indeed know their stuff and have done
quite a lot of legwork, it is not as if this
story was made up overnight.
I followed the thread for weeks up til around May
1st, and I always remember telling myself that
if they ever got the damn report out, this would
be easy money. Well the report is out, and it was
a couple million ounces better than I think the
better expectations/speculation on the thread.
I remember one fellow was calling for 5M and that
was so good, I dismissed him as a hypster at the
time--well, he was actually pretty close.
Your pessismism (?) warrants a check into your recent
posts--If you have a good track record, I may have
to lighten up--or did I simply misunderstand that post?
Also have a private message into another fellow who is
pretty savy, will weigh his thoughts too. Funny that up
til now I have been very confident, perhaps too confident.
On the other hand, I would not be surprised if
a handful of savy SI members were trying to talk
this down in order to get in cheaper before the
news shows up on CNBC. |
