Symantec (SYMC) - What does it look like? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Symantec (SYMC) - What does it look like?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kashish King who wrote (359)	11/18/1996 11:01:00 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	of 2069

Your faith in mankind and DDJ is comendable! I have never read it. Purhaps you would provide an URL for this bastion of integrity? BUT I was not referring to DDJ with my remark that some were acting with self interest. All I was saying was I cannot account for the strong emotion this subject evokes which you have demonstated. It all boils down to who you want to believe, I suppose. Softram 95 worked with Windows 3.1. Syncronys has maintained that all along. My research indicates that it is true. As far as disparaging the computer scientists I was referring to, what is your beef there? There technical papers say the same thing I am. And is this impossible that it did work. Other companies have programs that work. How come so many go wild when Softram is said to work on Win 3.1? This is old news your referring to anyhow, a year old. Lot's of things can happen in a year. They have aquired new talent and some computer scientists with very impressive credentials. They have been working. Let's see what they've got before you pronounce the old verdict again! BOB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next