SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Disk Drive Sector Discussion Forum
WDC 179.56+0.7%Dec 24 12:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frodo Baxter who wrote (3392)5/27/1998 6:58:00 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (2) of 9256
 
LK,
"Usual Sam-rant. Which drive maker increased their top line an astonishing 8.5% quarter-over-quarter last quarter? Which drive maker lost the least on their desktop operation?"
Yeah, they're apparently doing well now. Or so their PR suggests. I haven't seen the numbers you suggest, and even if I did, I probably wouldn't believe them. Don't forget, they're coming off a small base, and are in a sweet spot for them. They did this a few years ago, too, before Hyundai bought them. Stock went from about 4 to 18 and back again in about a 9 month period (in 92 or 93, I think).

I know, I know, I'm getting to be a parrot impersonator, but I still wonder if they are really making money, or if their factories were built with funny money. What depreciation do they show? I doubt they could afford to build them today, and I doubt that they will be able to afford to build more next year, if things in Korea Inc. keep going the way they are going, which seems likely. They are still small relatively potatoes for Hyundai (unless the car business goes under, always possible, I suppose). And if they use price to grab more market share, they will slit their own throat.

Meantime, I also presumed to be a Kam impersonator today. Hope I didn't take undue liberties. Please correct me if I was wrong (goes without saying, but ...).

s.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext