If I recall from an earlier post, you were singing praises for YAHOO. If you look in today's Wall Street Journal, there is an article (fairly lengthy one) detailing some of Yahoo's executives (the founders), who cashed in some stock, the original value ranging in price..but many of those shares originally were worth ONE CENT apiece.
Now give this issue a rest. If you read this story, since nothing we say prevents you from going back to this issue ad nauseum, there is one company we know you revere, seems to have given each other shares in the pennies and their paper worth is in the millions. Do you find this 'disturbing' that they have capitalized on their vision and yet YAHOO still needs to turn a profit and doesn't have near the revenue gernerating capability that PNLK does. Don't misunderstand me. I like YAHOO but the only comparison for me, is that they are both internet companies. It is apples and oranges.
The article is in section C-18... It details how 7 YAHOO insiders sold 29 mil shares with almost 46 mil outstanding and the price ranged from ONE PENNY on up. BTW, YHOO closed at around 115 with a 52 week range from 20 to 130. I am not one to hype or try to predict what PNLK will be worth in 1 week let alone 1 year, but in my opinion, it has a superior product and has a vision equal in the global concept, yet the revenue potential is mind-boggling.
Your inference that Jean Pierre Collardeau is doing something nefarious, is well, insulting. |
