SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG)
AENG 0.00010000.0%Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: john griffin who wrote (321)5/27/1998 10:38:00 PM
From: shashyazhi  Read Replies (3) of 3383
 
You are RIGHT about the comparative displacement. It IS 132.5 cubic inches versus 175 cubes for the Chevy.

But that's what this board is about: the exchange of ideas; many brains are bigger than one.

I don't see how it could work if you rotated the cam plate, and didn't
rotate the cylinder. Those cruciform upper and lower piston plates
have to be attached to the output shaft.

The engine is started by rotating the output shaft. The cam followers
in the piston plates follow the ascending ramps pushing the pistons up until two pistons fire at the same time.

Then the cam followers travel down the descending ramps. The output shaft has to turn in order to follow the ramps.

If you tried to rotate the cam plate instead, the output shaft could not be connected to the upper and lower piston plates. Piston motion
would not turn the output shaft.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext