I go away for a day and what happens? Just kidding! Haven't had a chance to read today's posts yet, but I'm sure there'll be no discontent. <G> Maybe I'll read them tomorrow.
I found this in my mail box and just had to post it. Once again, it's e-mail from David Travis and directed to Auric. I didn't edit out any names this time. Here it is.....
Greg, please remove my e-mail address and post this to SI.
Like most working people, I don't have a lot of time to be responding
to garbage like Goldy. However, when this liar attacks my honesty and integrity, I need to respond. I received his article by FAX and would like to propose something. Goldy represents he is some kind of big time investor so he must therefore have money. I would like to give Goldy the opportunity to earn more money.
Proposal 1.
Goldy and I will have an honesty contest. The entry fee is $500,000 each. The winner of the contest takes home his opponents entry fee as well as his own. Here's the contest. We'll have the three companies Goldy claims Mr. Bailey owns reviewed by an independent expert. If that expert determines Mr. Bailey is owner, OR EVEN A SHAREHOLDER of any of them,
Goldy gets my $500,000. Conversely, if it is proven he is not, I get
to keep his. Ready to stand by your statements Goldy?
Proposal 2.
You claim I have some kind of relationship with MXXX and VENT. Tell me what that is? I had to look up the MMID to find out who MXXX was. Anyway, again I will match your $500,000 on this one also. Again, an independent expert can come into my office in CO and look for a business relationship the CO office has with these two firms other than an occasional trade in stocks as market makers, and not in AENG.
I doubt I have even done a trade in AENG with either. So here is
another chance to win big. At my age I can't think real far back so
let's say I make available all my records for the last year. Should
be more than sufficient because AENG has only been trading for five
months and you infer our relationship is tied to AENG. You
substantiate that I have some type of working relationship, outside of an occasional trade, and you keep my $500,000 entry fee. If it is determined we do not have any such "relationship" your entry fee is mine. One last point,
you need to define this relationship you allude to in your dishonest statements. I want to make a point that my denial of any relationship with these firms in no way passes a judgement on these firms. I have no relationship with these firms and that's just a matter of fact. However, you seem to infer that a relationship with them would be something negative. So, why don't you slither out of your hole and tell us what you know about these firms.
Then you list a small portion of the stocks that traders at my firm trade.
HDWY, formerly AFGL, my NY office only has been positioning that
stock since it was $2. Or TGSI, where was that trading over the past
two years. Then there is ORTC, a unit IPO we did that is up over five
times ( Might want to ask Mr. Soros about this one) You missed GTAX, a unit IPO that we did @ $4 per unit. I think it trades at the
equivalent of $70 a unit now. Aside from that, what is the point of
this list of a small portion of stocks that various traders at the
firm trade? We are in and out of different stocks all the time.
That's what traders do, trade stocks. Again, what's your point?
Then you state Mr. Shelby has no idea how his name is being used. How do you know? I talk to Carroll several times a day and at night. He has no clue who you are. I'm assuming you are not such a coward to be entering these articles under a false name. I take that back,
reading your lies tells me you are just that kind of coward. Back to
Carroll. He asked, "who is this fool"? He has stated that the OX2
engine has probably added 20 years to his life. He says he must have
seen thousands of engine demonstrations and this is the first one he
hasn't wasted his time at. He has already hired half his engineering
team and has a prototype transmission selected. Today, he gave me his
time line for rolling out the first car. A lot shorter than I ever
imagined. AENG's problem is trying to keep Carrol toned down when he speaks about the engine. He also wonders how some of the experts on this board can question whether he did a proper analysis on this engine. He's been around the engine more than anyone else. Also, how can some of you state the OX2 can't do this or that or something else is a problem? You don't know how it works and he wonders how you can say it doesn't work. The technology is not like anything else out there. At first, he was very skeptical like many of you. Having been around the engine, he knows it works. Yet, some of you are in essence saying Carroll Shelby doesn't know what he's talking about. Get a clue guys! Shelby's mind is brilliant, especially regarding mechanical design. Remember who has seen the engine and who hasn't.
Now, back to you Goldy. Instead of being a liar and a coward, come out from behind that rock. Tell us who you really are and who you really
work for. What are your ties to the brokerage firm that you like to post for? By the way, AENG thought my idea was acceptable. Every contract signed will have a clause that the company signing with AENG cannot have any relationship with any of the firms on the list I provided to AENG.
So, Goldy want to make some money and back up the lies you have been
putting out? Stand up like a man for once and take my propositions.
I'm calling you a liar. Prove to everybody I'm wrong! Come out
in the day light and let's see who you really are.
One last thing you moron, I have been the high bid on this stock
probably 99% of the time. Who do you think has been buying at these
levels? The more shares I have the better. I will make a
ton of money on these shares. What this company has and what it is
working on is unbelievable. The companies I can see signing deals
with AENG will read like a who's who of industry. Unfortunately,
those will be the same companies that will not do business with
certain firm's. Especially the one that is paying you.
Well, it's 9 PM in CO and I still have work to do.
Ciao,
David Travis |
