Mandingo, that was similar to my math--which usually is lousy. But no one paid attention to it. Why? One reason is that Jon Tara helped set the table to go in the other direction.
In my view, since a publicly trading company has a responsibility to create the best shareholder value, I see ESVS shareholders rewarded for giving up the company's name and Nasdaq positioning. Similarly, I see Zulu shareholders being rewarded for having the faith to carry this thing into its future.
David Sirk's thing, to me, is an enigma. However, there is a rumor that Red Herring might piggyback, as Stock Detective did, what Wired put out, which--in my humble opinion, as it goes--is the result of former SIM disgruntlement. So perhaps this is the big deal he's speaking of.
But I remind everyone that--I believe it was the second one--Wired put out a blast on Zulu at the same time Zulu was presenting good news. The good news prevailed over the bad news at that time. Were Zulu issuing really super big news, I would suspect that this would easily dominate over a journal which utilizes sensation in order to attract new subscribers. |
