Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maxwell who wrote (33005)	5/29/1998 12:14:00 AM
From: Gary Ng	Read Replies (2) of 1570999

Maxell, Re: Why PII 300 ? 2) K6-2 IS CHEAPER! K6-2-300 OUTPERFORMS PII-300 by at least 10% on 3D Winstone. K6-2-300 is less than 1% slower than the PII-400. As I said real life application benchmark(Quake II for that matter) shows equivalent performance and 281 vs 320(210) does not show any price advantage IMO. 3) People of socket 7 can upgrade Pentium to K6-2 without buying a MB. You mean every existing S7 user can just plug K6-2 into their MB and get the demonstrated performance gain ? That doen't seems to be the case mentioned on AMD's site. Anyone have a definite clue about this ? 4) MB of socket 7 is about $50-$70 cheaper than slot 1 MB. SS7 or S7 ? In my area, SS7 is selling around the same price as LX board(less than $10 difference). The bottom line is that the performance improvement depends on how clever the programmers write the code I am wondering why Quake II's and Incoming's programmer cannot tune their program as good as Microsoft. Are Microsoft's programmer smarter or DirectX6 is a better 3D engine ? Gary

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next