TA-Quotes Plus Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : TA-Quotes Plus

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gary Lyben who wrote (4261)	5/30/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: Clark Wang	Read Replies (1) of 11149

Gary, thanks for bring up the difference between actuals and theoretical. I know the difference. I haven't looked the Q+ index data for a long time. I just checked the last 5 days of Nasdaq composite, there are lots of errors. 5/22/98 High: 1810.82, Q+: 1834.24 (that's more than 20 points) 5/26/98 Open: 1813.53, Q+: 1797.89 (more than 10 points) 5/29/98 Open: 1800.33, Q+: 1790.78 (more than 10 points) These data can be easily verified by intra-day data or www.nasdaq.com. On the candlestick chart, Q+ data could give you the wrong perception. If you go back the last 3 months, there are lots of days with more than 20 points errors. The situation is even worse for secondary indices. Hopefully, index data will be improved for R2. I still love the stock data. Q+ is simply the BEST because of the speed of scanning. However, they need to do some homework on indices. Clark

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next