SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 34.72-2.3%Nov 17 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Carson who wrote (56390)5/30/1998 2:35:00 PM
From: Xpiderman  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Intel may have opted to delay the Merced

latimes.com

Intel's decision to delay the Merced will lift some computer companies and harm others.

Sun Microsystems() Inc., which makes powerful servers and workstations, may benefit because the delay gives the company extra time to sell more of its $500,000 servers to companies that use its Solaris version of the Unix operating system, which competes with Windows NT from Microsoft Corp.

It also helps Digital Equipment Corp. push its Alpha chip, which is the most powerful available for workstations and servers. Intel's delay could help DEC shore up market share before the Merced is rolled out.

For Hewlett-Packard Co. and Silicon Graphics() Inc., the delay doesn't bode well. HP is developing the Merced in conjunction with Intel and is banking on the Merced for its server strategy, analysts said. It also stands to lose revenue in its workstation business, where it's the largest seller of the machines that run Intel chips and Windows NT.

"This is a minor blip on the radar screen," said Jim Carlson, head of systems marketing for the Merced effort at HP. He said HP already has plans for its own internal chip development until 2002 to help customers make the transition to the Merced.

Drew Peck, semiconductor analyst at Boston-based Cowen & Co., was forecasting the Merced would bring in an additional $3.6 billion in revenue, based on 3 million units, and an average price per chip of $1,200.

But Intel won't lose out on $3.6 billion because of the delay. It will make up for some of the revenue with an advanced, powerful Pentium II chip, code-named Xeon, which is due out by the end of June.

"Without Merced, the possibility exists we're going to continue to see relatively heavy pricing pressure and more erosion for their average price per chip," Peck said.

Barrett said the company made the decision to delay the Merced after Intel's annual meeting last week. The company had problems in the so-called validation process, where engineers work out bugs in early versions of chips to make sure they perform well.

"Our best assessment is that the project is a bit bigger and complicated than we assumed it would be," Barrett said. "We're pleased with the progress. There's not a basic problem with the technology."

To be sure, the Merced is Intel's most complicated and complex semiconductor chip since it got into the microprocessor business in the early 1980s. And Intel executives have taken pains to point out that the chip can crunch 64 bits of information simultaneously, double that of Intel's current processors.

Intel may have opted to delay the Merced because of the weak PC market. PC growth is forecast to slow to 13% this year, down from earlier predictions of 17%. Japan, a key computer market, is still in a recession, and competition has heated up for Intel from smaller but scrappy rivals such as Advanced Micro Devices() Inc. and National Semiconductor Corp.

"With PC prices collapsing, customers waiting for Windows 98 before buying any more PCs and Japan still a disaster, if Intel introduced Merced on time, it might actually cause the market to take a bigger dip," said analyst Dan Hutcheson at market research firm VLSI Research.


An introduction in a weak market could compel Intel to drop prices on the chip soon after its introduction, something "you never want to do with your flagship product because you never really recoup the profits," Hutcheson said.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext