Netscape -- Giant Killer or Flash in the Pan? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Netscape -- Giant Killer or Flash in the Pan?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gokhan Gezmisoglu who wrote (3370)	5/31/1998 2:47:00 PM
From: Pullin-GS	Read Replies (2) of 4903

My investing experience is NONE Thats the understatement of the year! <ROFL> From under which rock did you crawl Good one! Did you think of that all by yourself??? My two year old has better (and more original) one liners than that! Next! I do not hold stocks for long periods of time. Being that you work for Motorola as your profile states, I can see why. ;-) ...it surely would be in your best interest to exercise any options you get as soon as possible. I am a trader. Whatever you say....you are da man!<G> Which part of this did you have trouble understanding? Is that the best you can do in your reply to my "feeble" attack??? Sheesh! You cant find anything better to do than post more filler....and leave your lame-flame-bait-post open for another round of laughs! <VBG> I have modified my personal profile I'm glad you see things my way.;-) I have to accept you are in a league of your own It's not just me.....I'm sorry to lay this out to you, but everyone is in the same league I'm in (ie normal)....its you that shines about as bright as a black-hole. I guess that having the IQ of a turnip does set one apart from the rest of us. ;-) I did not have any position in CFON at the time of the post. Didn't I point that out already???? The point is you trash the stock, then state you have no position (where you had just rudely implied to an honest poster on the NSCP thread that anyone who states negative points is short a stock in your "experience")....that is why I replied to you in the first place. It disturbs me to see informational or inquisitive posts trashed just because a reader feels the poster MAY have an agenda that goes beyond the content of that person's SI post. You voiced your opinions , stating your experience as your source of dis-trust, not fact. I replied giving exact posting samples of your own that would go against your own theory. I hope I have been able to influence your future posts to the point that you will think before your post. People don't like being called a liar...directly or indirectly. I was checking the thread to see if I can find couple misguided bulls so I can short the stock. Huh?? Do you realize that what you just stated makes no sense at all? I stated that at the first line of my post and I did short the stock the next day. Back pedaling I see.;-) ....and of course you went short. Funny how you didn't mention it at any time in the thread before. Sure you did. ....now do you see how that little inuendo of mine (the one that implied that you were a liar) really ticked you off? Now in reality I should have said "I hope you were able to clean house on that CFON short. Good spot. Allot of people missed out on that free-money short". Regards...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next