Ron,
Again, its' insulting to all RMIL shareholders that you would ,after admitting to me via EMail you've done no DD on RMIL, condescend to Ellen and all RMIL shareholders that our diligence is less than one who admits to doing no DD on RMIL, and who, beyond that, suggests what we should do per our investment.
>>>>>| Previous | Next | Respond |
To: Trip (2074 )
From: Ron Reece Thursday, May 7 1998 10:03AM ET
Reply # of 2124
Trip, you had better watch your choice of words.
There have been a number of successful legal actions against libelous
individuals like yourself who come out here solely to trash a company.
You obviously have an agenda and I doubt it relates to shareholder
security.
People investing in this stock are doing so on speculation. So long as
they aren't betting the farm, they have the right to do so in complete
peace.
Eventually you'll learn how to be a truly qualified stock trasher, but
you ain't going to have any credibility without facts to back up your
claims or a little time spent out here proving the worth of your
thoughts.
Regards,
Ron<<<<<<
Practice what you preach Mr. Reece, if you've done your diligence on RMIL, which admittingly you have not, then we may indulge you in debate. Until then....you'll have credibility problems "w/o the facts to back up your claims , etc."
Pugs |
