LE, thank you, you actually go beyond your call of duty(and for $80 at that) in proving my point on the hypster's thread.
Revenues aren't everything. , your right, the income means everything, and that is what we(oops), I along with others who own stock still are waiting to verify. What kind of a hoky statement is that? Yeah, the OS is a problem, STILL the valuations at the very least show how much upside the company has. What kind of a determining factor is outstanding share count and float in picking investments when used in isolation?(a favorite tactic of yours by the way). All of the main stream valuations, PE, price to sales, price to income, etc use the share count, only in determining the per share data. If you are so hot on using OS alone, I suggest you pickup a boatload of ATXI, don't look at their income or their business model, just look at the OS and you should do well.
TELL ME HOW THE VALUATIONS THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO PICK APART ARE WRONG! I'M WAITING FOR ANOTHER PATHETIC RESPONSE
In fact, I hope that people read my original post and reread your's over and over again to see how you operate.
exchange2000.com
HIR has the lowest PE of the group and it's 9.8. The average ratio of market cap to income(this takes all the os into account by the way) is close to 40 and almost 20 times what the stock price is at now(forward). If you want, I'll do the whole sector with even larger companies because the numbers come up even better on FAMH's side.
Start your own thread, "LE's stock picks using latest neural network models and chaos theory, never applied as the picks are determined on OS alone".
--was I correct that you have been in FAMH more than once? I'm guessing that I am. Lot's of time for a lousy $80. I think you sold out of INFE way too early. Nice prognostication.
Jin. waiting, because I will throw every piece of garbage you put out and put a nice ribbon on it.
*tap tap tap waiting waiting waiting* |
